Skip to content
Unitive Knowledge Society
Search

Accents are optional; quotes find an exact phrase.

Movement

Comparative mysticism

The modern study of mysticism across religions, from Max Müller and William James to the perennialists and their critics.

Also called The modern study of mysticism, Perennialism

Introduction

Comparative mysticism is the modern study of mystical texts and experiences across religious traditions. It asks whether the mystics of different religions describe the same reality or experience, how their accounts should be read, and what, if anything, they reveal about the nature of reality and of the mind.

Its answers range widely. Perennialists hold that one wisdom underlies all religions and is most clearly seen in their mystics. Others, such as W. T. Stace, argue for a common core of experience, variously interpreted. Constructivists reply that experience is always shaped by language, belief and practice, so that mystics of different traditions have different experiences. Still others hold that the mystics should be read as teachers of ways of life, not reporters of experiences.

The study draws on philology, history, psychology, philosophy and, increasingly, the cognitive sciences. It is itself a modern tradition, with its classic texts, its debates and its blind spots.

History

Historical

The comparative study of religion grew in the nineteenth century from the translation of Asian scriptures, above all in Max Müller’s Sacred Books of the East, and from encounters such as the World’s Parliament of Religions in Chicago in 1893, where Swami Vivekananda presented Vedānta as a universal religion.

William James’s Varieties of Religious Experience (1902) made mystical experience a subject of psychological study, and Evelyn Underhill’s Mysticism (1911) a subject of wide reading. Rudolf Otto’s The Idea of the Holy (1917) and Mysticism East and West (1926) compared the holy and the mystical across religions. Aldous Huxley’s anthology The Perennial Philosophy (1945) gave the perennialist thesis its most popular form; R. C. Zaehner, in 1957, and W. T. Stace, in 1960, proposed rival typologies.

From the late 1970s, constructivist scholars led by Steven Katz challenged the idea of a common core, and others, among them Robert Forman, defended it. The debate continues, joined now by research in psychology and neuroscience.

  1. 1873Max Müller’s Introduction to the Science of Religion
  2. 1893The World’s Parliament of Religions in Chicago
  3. 1902William James’s Varieties of Religious Experience
  4. 1917Rudolf Otto’s Das Heilige
  5. 1945Aldous Huxley’s The Perennial Philosophy
  6. 1960W. T. Stace’s Mysticism and Philosophy
  7. 1978Constructivist critique: Steven Katz’s Mysticism and Philosophical Analysis

Major thinkers

Key concepts

Important texts

Convergence and divergence

Resemblance and difference, given equal room. Each note is marked with the kind of statement it makes.

Areas of convergence

  • The perennial philosophy, with Vedānta

    Historical

    Modern Vedānta, through Vivekananda and the Vedanta Societies, shaped the perennialist view; Huxley wrote The Perennial Philosophy in close contact with the Vedanta Society of Southern California.

Areas of divergence

Cite this entry
Chicago (bibliography)

“Comparative mysticism.” Tradition. The Library, Unitive Knowledge Society. Last modified November 7, 2026. https://www.unitiveknowledge.org/library/traditions/comparative-mysticism.

Chicago (note)

“Comparative mysticism,” tradition, The Library, Unitive Knowledge Society, last modified November 7, 2026, https://www.unitiveknowledge.org/library/traditions/comparative-mysticism.

MLA

“Comparative mysticism.” The Library, Unitive Knowledge Society, 7 Nov. 2026, www.unitiveknowledge.org/library/traditions/comparative-mysticism.

BibTeX
@misc{traditions-comparative-mysticism,
  title = {{Comparative mysticism}},
  howpublished = {The Library, Unitive Knowledge Society},
  note = {Tradition. Last modified November 7, 2026},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://www.unitiveknowledge.org/library/traditions/comparative-mysticism}
}