A Great Question

Do opposites meet in the ultimate?

Whether the contraries that structure thought, being and non-being, one and many, light and dark, are reconciled at the source of things.

Framing

Thought works by distinction: this and not that, being and not-being, one and many, good and evil. Yet many contemplative traditions have claimed that at the deepest level these oppositions fail. The ultimate, they say, is where contraries meet, or what lies beyond them both, and it can be approached only by a knowing that does not divide.

Others have answered that the law of contradiction holds everywhere, and that a reality in which opposites coincide would be no reality at all. Parmenides drew the opposite conclusion from the same starting point: since what is not cannot be, only being is, and becoming, which mixes being and not-being, is illusion.

The question bears on unitive knowledge directly. If opposites meet in the ultimate, then the knowledge of it must be something other than ordinary reasoning; if they do not, then perhaps reason, purified, can reach it.

Perspectives

Voices from several traditions, each in its own terms. They are set side by side to be compared, not ranked.

Early Greek Philosophy, Heraclitus
Scholarship
Opposites belong together in a hidden harmony: the way up and the way down are one, and the tension of contraries is the very order of the world.
Sources: The First Philosophers of Greece
Early Greek Philosophy, Parmenides
Scholarship
What is not cannot be or be thought; so there is no meeting of being and not-being. Only being is, one and unchanging, and the world of opposites belongs to mortal opinion.
Sources: The First Philosophers of Greece
Christian Mysticism, Nicholas of Cusa
Scholarship
In God the absolute maximum and minimum coincide; God is seen beyond the wall of the coincidence of contradictories, where reason cannot follow.
Sources: The Vision of God; Of Learned Ignorance
Christian Mysticism, Jacob Boehme
Scholarship
Nothing can be revealed without its contrary: God comes to self-manifestation through the opposition of darkness and light, wrath and love, which are reconciled in the end.
Sources: The Signature of All Things
Daoism, Zhuangzi
Scholarship
Every “this” is also a “that”; the sage does not take sides, but stands at the pivot of the Way, where the opposition of this and that disappears, and responds endlessly.
Sources: The Writings of Kwang-ze
Madhyamaka, Nāgārjuna
Scholarship
The ultimate cannot be said to be, not to be, both or neither; emptiness is not a meeting of opposites but the end of all views, including that one.
Sources: Mūlamadhyamakakārikā

Reflect

Which pair of opposites shapes your thinking most, and what lies between them?

Cite this entry

Chicago (bibliography): “Do opposites meet in the ultimate?” Question. The Library, Unitive Knowledge Society. Last modified November 7, 2026. https://www.unitiveknowledge.org/questions/do-opposites-meet-in-the-ultimate.
Chicago (note): “Do opposites meet in the ultimate?” question, The Library, Unitive Knowledge Society, last modified November 7, 2026, https://www.unitiveknowledge.org/questions/do-opposites-meet-in-the-ultimate.
MLA: “Do opposites meet in the ultimate?” The Library, Unitive Knowledge Society, 7 Nov. 2026, www.unitiveknowledge.org/questions/do-opposites-meet-in-the-ultimate.
BibTeX: @misc{questions-do-opposites-meet-in-the-ultimate, title = {{Do opposites meet in the ultimate?}}, howpublished = {The Library, Unitive Knowledge Society}, note = {Question. Last modified November 7, 2026}, year = {2026}, url = {https://www.unitiveknowledge.org/questions/do-opposites-meet-in-the-ultimate} }

Do opposites meet in the ultimate?

Framing

Perspectives

Early Greek Philosophy, Heraclitus

Early Greek Philosophy, Parmenides

Christian Mysticism, Nicholas of Cusa

Christian Mysticism, Jacob Boehme

Daoism, Zhuangzi

Madhyamaka, Nāgārjuna

Reflect

Concepts involved

Traditions

Continue the inquiry

Authors